State v. . Epps’s Empirical Analysis
1938
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently December 1989
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. . Ray · Speas v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co. · State v. Anderson · State v. Hart · State v. Barrett.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In S. v. Davenport , 156 N.C. 596 (614), is the following:”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“or who either commands, advises, instigates, or encourages another to commit a crime — a person who, by being present, by words or conduct, assists or incites another to commit the criminal act (Black's Dict., p. 6); or one”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. . Kelly“The common formula in a repealing clause that `all acts and parts of acts in conflict herewith are hereby repealed' implies very strongly that other acts on the same subject are not repealed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. . Foster
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.