213 N.J. Super. 123 - Reed v. Slaughter’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “it [was] ... proposed on behalf of plaintiff to pay immediately out of this sum $8,800 for legal fees and costs, and to put the balance in trust, with provision that nothing be released to plaintiff for a fixed period of at least ten years. If the fund were held for 20 years, the amount available to plaintiff would [have] be[en] approximately $83,000. If the sums received from welfare and Medicaid were paid at that time without interest, plaintiff would be left with approximately $60,000. If the welfare board and Medicaid were paid at once, after counsel fees, ... nothing would be left to plaintiff. {Id. at 125 (citations omitted).]”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Reed v. Slaughter

2. “because here there was not only no concealment, but explicit notification of the pendency of the law action without any request on the part of the welfare board for a reimbursement agreement.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 214 N.J. Super. 615 - Burlington County Welfare Bd. v. Stanley

3. “upon funds of the welfare recipient. It is only the execution of a reimbursement agreement which entitles the Board to repayment. [ Id. at 126 ].”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 214 N.J. Super. 615 - Burlington County Welfare Bd. v. Stanley