213 N.J. Super. 404 - State v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 2003
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Calandra · United States v. Mechanik · Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. v. Bravman · United States v. Chanen · In Re Addonizio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We hold that where a prosecutor obtains information which supports a legitimate and colorable basis for believing that a grand juror lacks impartiality, he may not unilaterally decide to allow that juror to remain on the panel. [State v. Murphy, 213 N.J.Super. 404, 409 (App.Div.1986).]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Murphy“[t]he triadic relationship between the courts, the prosecutor and the grand jury has been the source of much litigation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.