213 N.Y. 669
107 N.E 1081
Decided December 15, 1914
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1914-12-15
ment, entered May 9, 1913, as affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term in an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien.
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 1923
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1914-12-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 Judgment affirmed, with costs. Even if the original contract had not been under seal the evidence offered would not he sufficient to show that the same had been modified by a subsequent parol contract.
¶2 Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Collin, Cuddeback, Miller and Cardozo, JJ. Absent: Werner, J.