213 Or. App. 168 - State v. Holcomb’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
4
states following
January 2019
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“voluntary statements to the officers about the consequences that he possibly faced for his actions, his question about the [victim's family], and his statement that [the victim] attacked him all evidence[d] defendant's willingness and desire for a generalized discussion of the substance of the investigation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Thus, after an equivocal invocation, a suspect can waive his rights by reinitiating substantive conversation with the officers in a manner that evidences a willingness and a desire for a generalized discussion about the investigation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“An officer's duty to clarify a suspect's equivocal invocation may be obviated if the suspect initiates further substantive conversation concerning the investigation before the officer has clarified the suspect's intent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.