State v. Otis’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 2016
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Schwartz v. Pennsylvania · 121 Wash. 2d 220 - State v. Janes · Gardner v. Loomis Armored, Inc. · In Re Personal Restraint of Andress
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the defendant is eighteen years of age or older; and (2) the defendant was designated as a designated provider to a qualifying patient prior to assisting the patient with the medical use of marijuana; and (3) the defendant possessed no more marijuana than necessary for the qualifying patient’s personal, medical use for a sixty-day period; and (4) the defendant presented a copy of the qualifying patient’s valid documentation to any law enforcement official who requested such information; and (5) the defendant did not consume any of the marijuana obtained for the personal, medical use of the qualifying patient for whom the defendant is acting as designated provider; and (6) the defendant was the designated provider to only one qualifying patient at any one time.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Constantine
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.