Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 213 P.3d 877 - B.E. v. R.E.

B.E. v. R.E.’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
August 2011
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on T.L.W. v. Office of the Guardian Ad Litem · In re J. P. · In the Interest of J.C.O. v. Anderson · State, Department of Human Services Ex Rel. Parker v. Irizarry · State Ex Rel. Walter B.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “were made by [Grandmother] instead of [Father] ... [and] Father's only action was to ask [Grandmother] to make a few (unanswered) phone calls within an eight month period, which is only token efforts anyway.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “'conduct on the part of the parent which implies a conscious disregard of the obligations owed by a parent to the child, leading to the destruction of the parent-child relationship.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Mother's less-than-perfect behavior [in not answering or returning Grandmother's phone calls] does not negate the fact that Father failed to communicate with [T.E.] on his own.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.