Commonwealth v. MARINO’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 39 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently July 2001 · most notably Commonwealth v. Cruz (1980), Commonwealth v. Marino (1969)
3 federal appellate · 39 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Wade · Carroll v. United States · Stovall v. Denno · Gilbert v. California · Hoffa v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“cross, no such division exists as regards redirect and subsequent examinations; as to these subsequent examinations, the practice is uniform that the party's examination is limited to answering only such matter as was drawn out in the immediately preceding examination of the adversary. Id. Pennsylvania law regarding use of prior statements is consistent with this aforementioned uniform practice where portions of a statement made by a witness are used on cross-examination to impeach his testimony,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Catina v. Maree“unnecessarily suggestive and conducive to irreparable mistaken identification”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.