¶1Appellants seek review of an order rendered by the trial court denying them bail pending the appeal of their judgments of conviction and sentence. Appellants contend that the order appealed is premised upon the apprehension of the trial court that if bail is granted they will commit further criminal offenses during the pend-ency of their appeal. Appellants contend that this is not a valid ground for denying their motion for an order allowing them bail until their appeal is finally determined. The order appealed is affirmed. See Sanders v. State, (Fla.App.1966) 184 So.2d 686; Younghans v. State, (Fla.1956) 90 So.2d 308; Carbo v. United States, 82 S.Ct. 662, 7 L.Ed.2d 769; United States v. Piper, (D.C.Tex.1964) 227 F.Supp. 735. Contra, see Waller v. State, (Fla.App.1968) 208 So.2d 147.
213 So. 2d 622
Boatright v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 27, 1968
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1968-08-27
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1969
1 state decisions
Relies on Younghans v. State · 227 F. Supp. 735 - United States v. Piper · Sanders v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1968-08-27
View the full empirical analysis of this case →