Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

213 So. 3d 1114

Martin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2017-03-24

Relies on Wilson v. Department of Children & Families

Decided 2017-03-24

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentences, but we do so without prejudice to Appellant to file a timely, facially sufficient motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(a)(5). See Abbas v. State, 53 So.3d 1207, 1208 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011) (affirming judgment and sentence following the trial court’s summary denial of the defendant’s motion to withdraw plea that was “devoid of factual allegations in support of the requested relief,” but without prejudice to the defendant filing “a timely, facially sufficient motion pursuant to [rule] 3.850”).

¶2AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
/213/so3d/1114 · .json · Public domain