Josiah Coder v. William Arts’s Empirical Analysis
213 U.S. 223 · 1909
Citation profile
331 federal appellate · 89 district · 25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 669 later decisions (41 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2024 · most notably Vanston Bondholders Protective Committee v. Green (1946), Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. Radford (1935)
331 federal appellate · 89 district · 25 state decisions — followed in 13 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
reviewedCoder v. Arts (from Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals)
Relationships
Relies on Fred Bardes v. First National Bank of Hawarden Iowa · St Louis Iron Mountain Southern Railway Company v. May Taylor W · York Manufacturing Company v. Arthur Cassell J B · Pirie v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 669 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We are of opinion that Congress, in enacting § 67e, and using the terms ‘to hinder, delay, or defraud creditors,’ intended to adopt them in- their well-known meaning as being aimed at conveyances intended to defraud. In § 60 merely preferential transfers are defined, and the terms on which they may be .set aside are provided; in § 67e, transfers fraudulent under the well-recognized principles of the common law and the statute of Elizabeth are invalidated.””
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“"There is a clear distinction between ‘controversies arising in bankruptcy proceedings.’ as mentioned in section 24a, and tbe ‘proceedings in bankruptcy,’ which by section 24b the Circuit Courts of Appeals are given jurisdiction to superintend and revise in matter of law; for the former being generally held to embrace questions between ibe trustee, representing the bankrupt and his creditors, on the one side, and adverse claimants, on the other, and not directly affecting those administrative orders and judgments ordinarily known as ‘proceedings in bankruptcy,’ and the latter being confined to those questions arising between the bankrupt and his creditors, which are the very subject of such administrative orders and judgments, from the petition for adjudication to the discharge, and including the intermediate administrative steps and such controversies as arise between parlies to the bankruptcy proceedings as are involved in the allowance of claims, fixing their priorities, sales, allowances, and other matters to be disposed of summarily.””
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Taylor v. Voss · Jennings v. Mann““All conveyances, transfers, assignments, or incumbrances of his property, * * * made or given by a person adjudged a bankrupt * * * within four months prior to the filing of the petition, with the intent and purpose on his part to hinder, delay, or defraud his creditors, or any of them, shall be null and void against the creditors of such debtor.””
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.