Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 213 U.S. 458 - Re Frank D Winn

Re Frank D Winn’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
11
states following
April 1990
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 6 district · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1990 · most notably Ex parte Harding (1911), State ex rel. Ballard v. O'Donnell (1990)

4 federal appellate · 6 district · 15 state decisions — followed in 11 states

1001900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mottley · Virginia v. Rives · In the Matter of Albertn Moore an Infant by Next Friend · Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Caleb Powers · Ex parte Yerger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““That case simply held that where there was a diversity of citizenship, which gave jurisdiction to some Circuit Court, the objection that there was no jurisdiction in a particular district might be waived by appearing and pleading to the merits.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““It is well settled that no canse can be removed from the state court to the Circuit Court of the United States unless it could originally have been, brought; in the latter court.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.