Teague v. Alexander’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
August 1981
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 501 · 26 U.S.C. § 7421 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Relies on Oyler v. Boles · Speiser v. Randall · Cox v. State of Louisiana · Laird v. Tatum · Lamont v. Postmaster General
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“coordinate activities in all Compliance Divisions involving ideological, militant, subversive, radical, and similar type organizations; to collect basic intelligence data; and to insure that the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code concerning such organizations have been complied with.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Teague v. Alexander“18 percent on antiwar organizations and individuals, and 11 percent on groups and individuals described as”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Teague v. Alexander“the absence of any evidence that the organization was the subject of any adverse action by defendants.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Teague v. Alexander
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.