Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 213 VA 204 - Johnson v. Johnson

Johnson v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
April 1986
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Graham v. Graham · Butler v. Butler · Hudgins v. Hudgins · Upchurch v. Upchurch · Owens v. Owens

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The law does not permit courts to sever marriage bonds and to break up households merely because husband and wife, through unruly tempers, lack of patience, and uncongenial natures, live unhappily together. It requires them to submit to the ordinary consequences of human infirmities and unwise selections, and the misconduct which will form a good ground for legal separation must be very serious, and such as amounts to extreme cruelty, entirely subversive of the family relations, rendering the association intolerable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.