Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 213 W. Va. 771 - Joslin v. Mitchell

213 W. Va. 771 - Joslin v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
September 2014
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 177 W. Va. 734 - National Mutual Insurance v. McMahon & Sons, Inc. · 195 W. Va. 608 - Cox v. Amick · 183 W. Va. 556 - State Automobile Mutual Insurance v. Youler · 203 W. Va. 477 - Murray v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. · 159 W. Va. 508 - Prete v. Merchants Property Ins. Co. of Ind.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[a] statute should be so read and applied as to make it accord with the spirit, purposes and objects of the general system of law of which it is intended to form a part; it being presumed that the legislators who drafted and passed it were familiar with all existing law, applicable to the subject matter, whether constitutional, statutory or common, and intended the statute to harmonize completely with the same and aid in the effectuation of the general purpose and design thereof, if its terms are consistent therewith.” Syllabus Point 5, State v. Snyder, 64 W.Va. 659 , 63 S.E. 385 (1908).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]his Court reviews a circuit court’s entry of a declaratory judgment de novo, because the principal purpose of a declaratory judgment action is to resolve legal questions.... Any determinations of fact made by the circuit court or jury in reaching its ultimate judgment are reviewed under a clearly erroneous standard.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.