Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 214 Ark. 710 - Hildreth v. State

Hildreth v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
May 1987
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently May 1987

16 state decisions

8019491950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Shiver v. State · Robertson v. State · Ward v. State · Mitchell v. State · Blanks v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The statute is evidently based on the premise that the accused is entitled to a change of venue when hostile public sentiment makes an impartial hearing impossible. It would be patently illogical to grant the petition when affidavits are obtainable, but to refuse relief when public feeling is so antagonistic that the affidavits cannot be had.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.