In Re Schaffrath’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
9 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently December 2011
9 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1301 · 28 U.S.C. § 158
Relies on Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United States · Corzin v. Fordu (In Re Fordu) · Megan-Racine Associates Inc Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Na v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation · Higginbotham v. Corner Stone Bank · Higginbotham v. Corner Stone Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United States, 489 U.S. 794, 798 , 109 S.Ct. 1494, 1497 , 103 L.Ed.2d 879 (1989) (citations omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.