Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 214 CONN 146 - State v. Damon

State v. Damon’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
3
states following
June 2010
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 75 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently June 2010 · most notably State v. Oquendo (1992), State v. Greenfield (1993)

3 federal appellate · 75 state decisions

580199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Wong Sun v. United States · Florida v. Royer · United States v. Mendenhall · Ohio v. Roberts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To gain admission of a document under the business record exception to the hearsay rule, the proponent must show that (1) the document was made in the regular course of business, (2) it was the regular course of business to make such a record, and (3) the record was made when the act, transaction or event occurred, or shortly thereafter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “an actual or constructive seizure or detention of the person, performed with the intention to effect an arrest and so understood by the person detained.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the witness need not have been the entrant himself or even in the employ of the business when the entry was made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.