Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 214 CONN 242 - Connell v. Colwell

Connell v. Colwell’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

1,200
cited by 1,200 later decisions
3
states following
October 2022
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 15 district · 1,175 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,200 later decisions — most recently October 2022 · most notably Gurliacci v. Mayer (1991), Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp. (1994)

2 federal appellate · 15 district · 1,175 state decisions

93901990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lord Electric Co. v. United States · Alder v. United States · United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment Commission · Burns v. Hartford Hospital · Batick v. Seymour

Cited together with Fogarty v. Rashaw · Hammer v. Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co. · D.H.R. Construction Co. v. Donnelly · Batick v. Seymour · Burns v. Hartford Hospital

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,200 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In deciding a motion for summary judgment, the trial court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.”
    259 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “incumbent upon the party opposing summary judgment to establish a factual predicate from which it can be determined, as a matter of law, that a genuine issue of material fact exists.”
    48 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “`[m]ere assertions of fact . . . are insufficient to establish the existence of a material fact and, therefore, cannot refute evidence properly presented to the court under Practice Book Sec. 380.'”
    26 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.