In re Dodson’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
87 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 87 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably Ullmann v. State (1994), In re Jonathan M. (2001)
87 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. United Mine Workers of America · United States v. Russell · Tumey v. State of Ohio · In re Oliver · Ungar v. Sarafite
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 87 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]o deny the motion to dismiss based on a claim of late filing will deprive the defendant of an opportunity to raise constitutional CT Page 12791 due process claims. Section 6 of the Practice Book states that `these rules . . . will be interpreted liberally in any case where it shall be manifest that a strict adherence to them will work surprise or injustice.' The court is of the opinion that to deprive the defendant of an opportunity to be heard on a claim of lack of personal jurisdiction, based upon the history of these pleadings, will manifestly be unjust."”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“are a means to justice and not an end in themselves, their purpose is to provide for a just determination of every proceeding.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[r]ight to exercise powers; to implement and enforce laws; to exact obedience; to command; to judge. . . . [It is] [o]ften synonymous with power.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.