Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 214 CONN 38 - State v. Holliman

State v. Holliman’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

109
cited by 109 later decisions
3
states following
February 2022
most recently cited

109 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 109 later decisions — most recently February 2022 · most notably Williams Ford, Inc. v. Hartford Courant Co. (1995), State v. Robinson (1993)

109 state decisions

7501990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Wade · Stovall v. Denno · Manson v. Brathwaite · Gilbert v. California · Colorado v. Connelly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 109 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"the criteria established for determining the admissibility of identifications in the due process context are appropriate guidelines by which to determine the admissibility of identifications that result from procedures conducted by civilians." 570 A. 2d at 684 .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 171 Conn. App. 436 - State v. Berthiaume · 259 N.J. Super. 217 - State v. McCord
  2. “Because the [fourteenth] [a]mendment is directed at the states, it can be violated only by conduct that may be fairly characterized as `state action.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Phelan v. Bloomfield Board of Education, No. Cv93 525737 (Mar. 17, 1995) · 170 Conn. App. 768 - State v. Patterson
  3. “The most outrageous behavior by a private party seeking to secure evidence against a defendant does not make that evidence inadmissible under the Due Process Clause. [State v. Holliman, 214 Conn. 38 , 570 A.2d 680 (1990) citing to Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157, 166 , 107 S.Ct. 515, 521-22 , 93 L.Ed.2d 473 (1986)]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. McCoy

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.