Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 214 CONN 657 - State v. Bergin

State v. Bergin’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

140
cited by 140 later decisions
4
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

140 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 140 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Simms v. Warden, State Prison (1994), Simms v. Warden (1994)

140 state decisions

6201990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Franks v. Delaware · United States v. Scott · United States v. Wilson · Johnson v. Righetti · Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Independent Federation of Flight Attendants

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 140 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Dismissal of an information is a drastic action that is appropriate in cases where there [is] a need either to eliminate prejudice to a defendant in a criminal prosecution, where it [is] impossible to do so by imposition of lesser sanctions, or to deter a pattern of demonstrated and longstanding widespread or continuous official misconduct.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[B]efore a defendant is entitled to a Franks hearing for an alleged omission, he must make a substantial preliminary showing that the information was (1) omitted with the intent to make, or in reckless disregard of whether it made, the affidavit misleading to the issuing judge, and (2) material to the determination of probable cause.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “[w]here the [information] alleges that an offense allegedly occurred `on or about' a certain date, the defendant is deemed to be on notice that the charge is not limited to a specific date.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.