Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 214 F.1d 131 - The Cimbria

The Cimbria’s Empirical Analysis

214 F. 131 · 1914

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
October 1968
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 1968

2 federal appellate · 6 district ·

30191419201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The Murphy Tugs · City of Camden · The Queen of St. Johns · Petrie v. The Steam-Tug Coal Bluff No. 2

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In the present case, libelant was more than a mere stockholder. He was a director and actively engaged in transacting the business, involving both the company’s finances and its use of the vessel. * * * The conclusion here reached, while contrary to that reached in The City of Camden (D. C.) 147 Fed. 847 , is fully supported by The Murphy Tugs (D. C.) 2S| Fed. 429, and The Queen of St. Johns (C. C.) 31 Fed. 24 , which, squaring more with my own judgment, I am constrained to follow.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Gyda

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.