United States v. Mackey’s Empirical Analysis
214 F. 137 · 1913
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 1994
3 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Shively v. Bowlby · Donnelly v. United States · Hardin v. Jordan · John Pollard et al. v. John Hagan et al. · United States v. Rio Grande Dam & Irrigation Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the defining of the rights of riparian owners in the beds of navigable streams is not a rightful subject of territorial legislation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.