Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 214 F.2d 366 - Ray v. Hasley

Ray v. Hasley’s Empirical Analysis

214 F.2d 366 · 1954

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
3
states following
February 2000
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently February 2000 · most notably Cruz v. Melecio (2000), PPG Industries, Inc. v. Continental Oil Co. (1973)

16 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

100195419601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2106

Relies on Railroad Commission v. Pullman Co. · Kline v. Burke Construction Co. · Chicago v. Fieldcrest Dairies, Inc. · Butler v. Eaton · Harrison v. Remington Paper Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]rrespective of whether the judgment in the state court operated as res judicata pending appeal, the federal court should take into consideration the possibility of a reversal of that judgment ....”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.