United States v. Boyd’s Empirical Analysis
214 F.3d 1052 · 2000
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · United States v. Gonzalez-Sandoval · United States of America v. John Fife Symington III · United States v. Tucker · United States v. Mills
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““An action based on an indictment, information or complaint guarantees that the charges receive initial attention from a neutral magistrate. By contrast, a violation notice is completed by a law enforcement officer alone, without the oversight of a magistrate. Because one of Boyd’s charges is not a petty offense, the government had to go through the proper procedures for prosecuting under an information. If the government is not allowed to proceed to trial on the basis of a violation notice in a case such as Boyd’s, it should not still be held to a 30-day clock based on that same violation notice.” Id. at 1057 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“when a suspect is formally charged at the time of, or immediately following, arrest, or when a suspect is subject to some continuing restraint on liberty imposed in connection with the charge on which the subject is eventually tried.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. U.S. v. Lozoya“[a]ny information or indictment charging an individual with the commission of an offense shall be filed within thirty days from the date on which such individual was arrested or served with a summons in connection with such charges.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. U.S. v. Lozoya
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.