Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 214 F.3d 1151 - Morales v. City of Los Angeles

Morales v. City of Los Angeles’s Empirical Analysis

214 F.3d 1151 · 2000

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
August 2019
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Wilson v. Garcia · Delaware State College v. Ricks · Speth v. New Jersey · Karim-Panahi v. Los Angeles Police Department · Danner v. Kentucky

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although state law determines the length of the limitations period, federal law determines when a civil rights claim accrues.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a claim accrues when the plaintiff knows or has reason to know of the injury which is the basis of the action.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “we also apply California's tolling rules that are not inconsistent with federal law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Azer

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.