Charles Anthony v. Thomas Maul’s Empirical Analysis
214 F.3d 350 · 2000
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 8 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently November 2022 · most notably Francis S. v. Stone (2000), Timothy Johnson Sr Luaine Sims Tj v. Newburgh Enlarged School District (2001)
2 federal appellate · 8 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Will v. Michigan Department of State Police · Allen v. McCurry · United States v. Salerno
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Esther Smith, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Local 819 I.B.T. Pension Plan the Board of Trustees of the Local 819 I.B.T. Pension Plan, Defendants-Third-Party the Board of Trustees of Teamsters Local 819 Pension Fund, Individually and on Behalf of the Teamsters Local 819 Pension Fund, Third-Party v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company, Third-Party · Brown v. City of Oneonta“(1) whether the right in question was defined with ‘reasonable specificity’; (2) whether the decisional law of the Supreme Court and the applicable circuit court support the existence of the right in question; and (3) whether under preexisting law a reasonable defendant official would have understood that his or her acts were unlawful.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“deprivation[s] of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.