Kruger v. Apfel’s Empirical Analysis
214 F.3d 784 · 2000
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Ball v. City of Chicago · Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp. · Hunger ex rel. Hunger v. Leininger · Williams v. Chicago Board of Education · Robyns v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“only in extreme situations, when there is a clear record of delay or contumacious conduct, or when other less drastic sanctions have proven unavailable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.