¶1 William Earl Gorham appeals the district court’s orders dismissing part of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000) and denying relief on the remainder of his claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders for the reasons stated by the district court. See Gorham v. Kentworthy, No. 5:05-ct-00042-H (Aug. 4, 2005 and Sept. 12, 2006). We also deny Gorham’s motion to alter his filing fee. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶2 AFFIRMED.