Chambers v. Whirlpool Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 2301 (Magnuson-Moss Warranty—Federal Trade Commission Improvement Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1711 (§ 3 of the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1712 (§ 3 of the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1715 (§ 3 of the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Relies on Blum v. Stenson · City of Burlington v. Dague · Cabrera-Martinez v. United States · Ed. Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., a Corporation, Richard A. Perkins, Counsel for Ed Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., a Corporation, H. O'Neil Shanks, and Norman Stevans, Richard A. Perkins, Counsel For · Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.