¶1dissenting. I dissent as to division one and the corresponding headnote and to the judgment of affirmance, upon the grounds that I think the amendment deals *518solely with jurisdiction and venue and is not retroactive, but is within the constitutional power of the legislature to enact, and does not impair the rights of any party in any cause. Mr. Justice Candler joins me in this dissent.
214 Ga. 513
106 S.E.2d 28
Sharpe v. Lowe
Decided October 10, 1958
Supreme Court of Georgia · decided 1958-10-10
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1958-10-10
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 2009
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →