Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 214 GA 786 - Starling v. Starling

Starling v. Starling’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
September 1989
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Waycross Military Association v. Hiers · Lankford v. Milhollin · Lowry v. Lowry · Johnson v. Stancliff · Bowles v. White

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “can only set out matters germane to the case as made by the [husband's] petition and cannot recover a personal judgment against the [husband] on a separate and independent matter. . . . (citing two cases.) And a cross-action which sets up matters unrelated and unresponsive to the plaintiff’s petition is not germane to the case; and it is, for that reason, not maintainable. ( 107 S.E.2d at 653-654 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.