Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 214 La. 1099 - Douglas v. Haro

Douglas v. Haro’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

64
cited by 64 later decisions
1
states following
April 2012
most recently cited

64 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently April 2012 · most notably Giron v. Housing Auth. of City of Opelousas (1981), 163 So. 2d 406 - Breaux v. Pan American Petroleum Corporation (1964)

64 state decisions

27019491950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Reeves v. Globe Indemnity Co. of New York · Succession of Todd · De Hart v. Continental Land & Fur Co. · Bologna Bros. v. Stephens

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The jurisprudence of this state is well established to the effect that where a petition fails to state a cause of action, due to insufficient allegations, an opportunity to allege those facts should be afforded in the interest of upholding substantive rights instead of subtle technicalities.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “in order to render substantive justice and to avoid a multiplicity of suits,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “"Under the provisions of our Civil Code, a deposit is defined as an act by which a person receives the property of another, binding himself to preserve it and return it in kind. The depositary must use the same diligence in preserving the deposit as he does in preserving his own property and the deposit must be restored on demand in the state in which it is in at the moment of restitution subject to deteriorations not affected by an act of the depositary. Articles 2926, 2937, 2945, 2955, Revised Civil Code." 39 So.2d 744, 745 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.