James v. Noble’s Empirical Analysis
1948
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
June 1968
most recently cited
4 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Vincent v. Bullock · Frost Lumber Industries, Inc. v. Union Power Co. · International Accountants Society v. Santana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1). The specific identification of the parties designated in the agreement as "mineral owners." (2). The specific description of the several tracts comprising the unit. (3). The identification of the servitudes bearing on the several tracts. (4). Specific, clear and concise acknowledgment of the right of the person whose title the debtor or possessor prescribes adequately describing the property to which it applies. (5). A sufficient identification of the servitude as to which acknowledgment is sought to be made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Roberts v. Cooper
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.