Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 214 La. 600 - State v. Murphy

State v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 2019

6 state decisions

2019481950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Article 386. Whenever the indictment sets out an offense including other offenses of less magnitude or grade the judge shall charge the jury the law applicable to all offenses of which the accused could be found guilty under the indictment. The only responsive verdicts which may be rendered, and upon which the judge shall charge the jury, where the indictment charges the following offenses are: 5jí j}? ij» 5^ » “Manslaughter “Guilty as charged. “Not guilty. * * *””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The gravamen of the offense of aggravated arson is the endangering of human life; whereas the gravamen of the offense of simple arson is the damaging of the property of another without his consent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.