Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 214 MDAPP 512 - Lovelace v. State

Lovelace v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Edwards v. Arizona · Moran v. Burbine · Michigan v. Mosley · Davis v. United States · Maryland v. Shatzer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he general rule regarding admission of photographs is that their prejudicial effect must not substantially outweigh their probative value. This balancing of probative value against prejudicial effect is committed to the sound discretion of the trial judge. The trial court’s decision will not be disturbed unless ‘plainly arbitrary,’ ... because the trial judge is in the best position to make this assessment. Photographs must also be relevant to be admissible ... The relevancy determination is also committed to the trial judge’s discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.