Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 214 MICH 501 - McCarthy v. Couzens

McCarthy v. Couzens’s Empirical Analysis

1921

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
October 1947
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lynch v. Board of Trustees of Fireman's Pension & Relief Fund · State ex Rel. Fouche v. Verner · Blickle v. Kent Probate Judge

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The question for determination at the hearing by the fire commission on April 20, 1916, was: While in the discharge of his duties did McCarthy receive injuries which resulted in his death within one year thereafter? This was a question of fact for the judgment and discretion of. the commission whose function was not ministerial hut quasi- judicial. The charter provided no appeal from or review of its decision. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.