Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 214 Minn. 281 - Pelser v. Gingold

Pelser v. Gingold’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
8
states following
September 2012
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently September 2012 · most notably Orme v. Atlas Gas and Oil Co. (1944), Trondson v. Janikula (1990)

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 36 state decisions

13019431950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kettle River Railroad v. Eastern Railway Co. · Belmont v. . Coman · Ylijarvi v. Brockphaler · Fiske v. Tolman · 30 N.J. Eq. 591 - Heid v. Vreeland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Generally speaking, a covenant touches or concerns the land if it is such as to benefit the grantor or the lessor, or the grantee or lessee, as the case may be. As the term implies, the covenant must concern the occupation or enjoyment of the land granted or demised and the liability to perform it, and the right to take advantage of it must pass to the assignee. Conversely, if the covenant does not touch or concern the occupation or enjoyment of the land, it is the collateral and personal obligation of the grantor or lessor and does not run with the land."”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “An assignment of an executory contract does not create a personal liability on the part of the assignee to perform the provisions of the contract to be performed by the assignor unless there is a provision to that effect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.