Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

214 N.C. 279

199 S.E 28

Ward v. . Sewell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 12, 1938

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1938-10-12

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1957

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1938-10-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Stacy, C. J.

¶1 It hardly seems worth while to debate tbe question whether plaintiff bas waived bis right to a jury trial by failure to tender proper issues upon bis exceptions to tbe report of tbe referee when it appears on tbe face of tbe record tbat a compulsory reference was ordered without first disposing of tbe pleas in bar. Graves v. Pritchett, 207 N. C., 518, 177 S. E., 641; McIntosh N. C. Prac. and Proc., 564. Why engage in tbe fruitless task of deciding a question of procedure in a reference which eventually must be set aside? Pritchett v. Supply Co., 153 N. C., 344, 69 S. E., 249.

¶2 Tbe order of reference will be vacated and tbe cause remanded for further proceedings as to justice appertains and tbe rights of tbe parties may require.

¶3 Remanded.

/214/nc/279 · .json · Public domain