Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 214 P3D 312 - Douglas v. State

Douglas v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
4
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Faretta v. California · Illinois v. Allen · Davis v. Washington · United States v. Jorn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “after he has been warned by the judge that he will be removed if he continues his disruptive behavior, he nevertheless insists on conducting himself in a manner so disorderly, disruptive, and disrespectful of the court that his trial cannot be carried on with him in the courtroom.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “is in the best position to assess how disruptive a defendant's behavior is[,] and how likely it is to continue.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “fully and fairly [inform the defendant] that his conduct is wrong and intolerable”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.