214 So. 3d 35 - Frankowski v. Frankowski’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin · 15 So. 3d 308 - O'DWYER v. Edwards · Smart v. GOLD, WEEMS, BRUSER, SUES · 56 So. 3d 403 - Fletchinger v. Fletchinger · Wood v. Wood
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because the district court's judgment on an exception of vagueness is based on a factual determination, an appellate court reviews the district court's judgment under the manifest error standard of review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]he purpose of the dilatory exception of vagueness is to allow a defendant to be placed on notice of the cause of action and prevent its future re-litigation after a judgment is obtained.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The exception, however, does not permit the defendant to demand exactitude and detail beyond what is necessary for the above purposes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.