State v. Hicks’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Francois v. State · Mobley v. State · 474 So. 2d 332 - Ware v. State · Williams v. State · 529 So. 2d 366 - Williams v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the trial court to determine under the totality of the circumstances if Appellee did in fact abscond from probationary supervision. If the trial court finds that Appellee did abscond, then Appellee's probationary period was tolled until he was arrested and the trial court would have jurisdiction to consider the VOP warrant and any amendments to it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[W]hen a probationer absconds from supervision, the probationary period is tolled until the probationer is once more placed under probationary supervision.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.