Poole v. Cage’s Empirical Analysis
1919
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 1987
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Freiberg, Kline & Co. v. Magale · 15 Tex. Civ. App. 655 - Willis v. Sanger Bros. · Richardson v. Powell · Johnson v. Newman · Law Sprinkle Mercantile Co. v. Hause
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We fail to see what bearing these statutes [articles 5693 and 5695] have upon the question of the validity of a future indebtedness clause in a mortgage or deed of trust. Their sole purpose is to prohibit the sale of land under a trust deed or its recovery by a vendor after the debt for which the lien was created has become barred by limitation, and to provide that any renewal of the debt should be by written instrument duly acknowledged and recorded. “As we have before shown, no judgment was rendered in this case foreclosing a lien-for any barred indebtedness, and no question of any renewal of the indebtedness is presented.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.