Goree v. Hansen’s Empirical Analysis
1948
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 1975
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rayburn v. Giles · Long-Bell Lumber Co. v. Bynum · Associates Inv. Co. v. Thomas · Texas Bus Lines v. Whatley · Muran v. Muran
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In the absence of a conclusion of an appellate court that the jury finding is so overwhelmingly contrary to a preponderance of the evidence as to be clearly wrong and the probative evidence adduced is conflicting, it is the accepted rule that when a jury decides upon one theory of the conflict, all the testimony will, be construed in the light most favorable to the verdict, and if there is competent testimony of , probative value found the appellate court may, not set the verdict aside and substitute its own-finding for that of the jury. Long-Bell Lumber Co. v. Bynum, 138 Tex. 267 , 158 S.W.2d 290 ; Rayburn v. Giles, Tex.Civ.App., 182 S.W.2d 9 , writ refused; Associates Inv. Co. ,v. Thomas, Tex.Civ.App., 210 S.W.2d 413 ; Muran v. Muran, Tex.Civ.App., 210 S.W.2d 617 ; Texas Bus Lines v. Whatley [Tex.Civ.App.], 210 S.W.2d 626 , writ refused NRE.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.