Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 214 SW3D 306 - Commonwealth v. McKenzie

Commonwealth v. McKenzie’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 2023

4 state decisions

30200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bell v. Commonwealth · Parks v. Commonwealth · Schambon v. Commonwealth · Anderson v. Commonwealth · Johnson v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “under modern rules the essential question when examining variance between the indictment and the proof is whether the defendant in fact had fair notice and a fair trial”); McKenzie, 214 S.W.3d at 309 (overruling Brown, supra, and its predecessors to the extent”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “amending the indictment to include an allegation that the defendant is guilty of the underlying charge by complicity does not constitute charging an additional or different offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.