Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

214 S.W.3d 350

State v. Hogg

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 13, 2007

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2007-02-13

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2009

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2007-02-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Defendant, Dominic Hogg, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of statutory rape in the second degree, in violation of Section 566.034 RSMo (2000). The trial court found defendant to be a persistent offender and sentenced him to twelve years imprisonment, to be served consecutively to sentences imposed in two other cases.

¶3No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

¶4The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

/214/sw3d/350 · .json · Public domain