Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

214 S.W.3d 404

State v. Sitton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 20, 2007

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2007-02-20

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 2013

1 state decisions

Relies on State v. Norman

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2007-02-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2William J. Sitton (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment of conviction entered upon the jury’s verdict finding Appellant guilty of first-degree involuntary manslaughter and armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not plainly err, and no manifest injustice or a miscarriage of justice occurred. State v. Norman, 178 S.W.3d 556, 560 (Mo.App. W.D.2005). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

/214/sw3d/404 · .json · Public domain