Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 214 S.W.3d 5 - Fletcher v. State

Fletcher v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas))

Relationships

Relies on Monge v. California · Monge v. California · Garza v. State · Jones v. State · Ex Parte Watkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because the State failed to make a pri-ma facie showing of finality, the appellant had no burden to carry nor was he obligated to complain about or object to the lack of finality of the alleged prior conviction. The case is simply one of failure' of the State to sustain its burden of proof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.