Jacinto Lorenzo Lopez Laborde v. Pablo Ubarri’s Empirical Analysis
214 U.S. 173 · 1909
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 8 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1994 · most notably Big Vein Coal Co. v. Read (1913), State ex rel. St. Louis, Brownsville & Mexico Railway Co. v. Taylor (1924)
6 federal appellate · 8 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Henry Toland v. Horatio Sprague · Clark v. Wells · Ex parte Railway Co. · Chaffee v. Hayward
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is conceded that the person against whom this suit was brought in the Circuit Court was an inhabitant of the state of Massachusetts, and was not found in or served with process in Iowa. Clearjy, then, he was not suable in the circuit court of the District of Iowa, and unless he could be sued, no-attachment could issue from that court against his property. An attachment is but an incident to a suit, and unless the suit can be maintained the attachment must fall.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Smith v. Reed
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.